Bien cher Rogémi,
Je me bornais à reproduire une partie des articles que vous mettiez en lien :
And while the case is raising some eyebrows, a tangled behind-the-scenes custody battle must be taken into account, said Montreal family law lawyer, Miriam Grassby.
"It's a very different situation than a child who might appear to not be be happy with the parent's decision and simply saying ‘I'm going to go court and I'm going to get what I want," she said. "And if in fact it's been portrayed that way, it's not putting in its complex context.
While the girl's father has full legal custody, pending a further court decision, the girl has been living with her mother, Ms. Fortin said. But while Ms. Beaudoin says the girl went to live with her mother when her father forbade her from going on the trip, Ms. Fortin contends that she was "kicked out" of her father's house over family tensions.
"In a situation like this where you're in contested custody proceedings, there's often a high level of conflict," said Ms. Grassby. "And one of the reasons that in Quebec that children have lawyers named for them is because the parents and the court recognizes that in high conflict situations it gives the child a safe place to first give their opinion, and get advice."
Pour faire court, il est évident qu'il ne s'agit pas, comme dirait notre secrétaire d'Etat, d'une "chieuse" revendicatrice de droits, mais d'une affaire plus complexe.
Le juge ne donne pas raison à une gamine contre son père. Il est dans la situation suivante :
- le père a la garde légale ;
- une action est en cours à ce propos ;
- l'enfant réside chez sa mère ;
- la règlementation québéquoise prévoit, pour le type de sortie, l'accord des deux parents ;
- le père ne donne pas l'accord.
C'est une affaire sordide, et que je qualifierai "d'indémerdable".